Skip to content

The best NAS enclosures for 2026

A NAS enclosure is a small computer whose job is to hold drives and serve them, and some of this shelf is sold empty and some of it arrives with the drives already in, which changes what the price compares against. Bay count is the first figure and the hardest to change afterwards, because adding a bay usually means buying another enclosure. The drive interface follows: bays for 3.5-inch SATA drives, often with mounting for 2.5-inch ones, and increasingly one or two M.2 slots whose intended use — caching, or a separate fast volume — is published by the maker and differs between models. Redundancy arrangements are named on every listing, and this site describes them for exactly what they are: a way of carrying on through a drive failure, which is a different thing from having the data in a second place. A copy on separate hardware is a separate arrangement, and no redundancy level stands in for it. What decides how the unit behaves day to day is the processor and memory, since transcoding video, running containers and serving several people at once all lean on them, and memory is sometimes expandable and sometimes soldered down. Then the connections: Ethernet port count and speed, whether two sockets can be aggregated, and USB ports for copying to an attached drive. The operating system is the least comparable part and the part people live with; read the list of applications the maker publishes rather than the marketing around it. Noise and idle draw matter in a flat. We compare bay count and drive interface, solid-state slot count, processor and memory, Ethernet port count and speed, USB ports, supported redundancy levels, published operating system, stated idle power, stated acoustic figure and stated dimensions.

The ones worth installing

  1. Synology DiskStation DS124

    one bay, sold empty · DSM named and license-free · surveillance with people and vehicle detection · 24 months · no processor, no memory, no socket

    One of two Synology listings on this shelf that name DSM, and one of three here that publish a surveillance function — on a page that publishes no hardware figure at all.

    Best for: A first one-bay machine chosen for DSM and the surveillance function, by someone who will pick the drive themselves.

    ≈ $160

  2. Synology DS225+, two-bay enclosure with one 2.5GbE and one 1GbE socket

    two bays · Intel Celeron J4125, quad-core · 2 GB DDR4 to 6 GB · one 2.5GbE and one 1GbE socket · compatibility list required

    A two-bay enclosure that publishes its processor, its memory ceiling and the exact module that raises it, and one 2.5GbE socket beside a 1GbE one — but no drive size, no array level and no software name.

    Best for: A household or small office replacing an older two-bay unit, where the applications matter more than the price and where a compatibility list is not an obstacle.

    7.8/10

    ≈ $421

  3. BUFFALO LinkStation 220, 4 TB

    two bays · 4 TB of drives included · ships in RAID 1 with 2 TB usable · $143.00 per usable terabyte · 24 months covering the drives · macOS 15 ceiling

    The bottom rung of the LinkStation 220 ladder, and the most expensive terabyte on it: two terabytes usable for $285.99, where the twelve-terabyte version of the same box asks less than a third as much per terabyte.

    Best for: The smallest mirrored LinkStation, for someone who wants two terabytes protected and nothing else, and will not want more later.

    ≈ $286

  4. BUFFALO LinkStation 220, 8 TB

    two bays · 8 TB of drives included · ships in RAID 1 with 4 TB usable · $90.75 per usable terabyte · 24 months covering the drives · macOS 15 ceiling

    The middle rung of the LinkStation 220 ladder, and the one the arithmetic favors: four usable terabytes at $90.75 each, against $143.00 on the smaller box and $112.00 less than the SoHo version of the same capacity.

    Best for: Four protected terabytes at the best price on the LinkStation ladder, for a household that will not need a third year of warranty.

    ≈ $363

  5. BUFFALO LinkStation 210, 6 TB

    one bay · 6 TB drive included · the 4 TB page word for word · $38 for 2 TB more · 24 months covering the drive

    The same one-bay machine as the 4 TB LinkStation 210 with a larger drive in it, on a page identical but for the capacity line — which makes the two prices the only thing to compare.

    Best for: The same sealed one-bay machine as the 4 TB version, for anyone who would rather pay $38 than run out of room.

    ≈ $231

  6. BUFFALO LinkStation 710, 8 TB

    one bay · 8 TB drive included · macOS 26 supported · hybrid cloud sync named · no RAID claimed · 24 months covering the drive

    The range five other listings on this shelf tell their buyers to look at, with current macOS support, cloud sync to three services, and — on a one-bay machine — no RAID claim at all.

    Best for: Eight terabytes of network storage on a current Mac, all of it usable, where a second drive is not wanted and a backup will live somewhere else.

    ≈ $383

  7. BUFFALO LinkStation 720, 4 TB

    two bays · 4 TB of drives included · ships in RAID 1 with 2 TB usable · macOS 26 supported · hybrid cloud sync named · $204.50 per usable terabyte

    The two-bay LS 700, with current macOS support and named cloud services, and the most expensive usable terabyte on this shelf: two terabytes protected for $408.99, where the one-bay unit beside it gives eight for less.

    Best for: Two terabytes that have to survive a drive failure on a current Mac, where the small capacity is the point and the price per terabyte is accepted.

    ≈ $409

  8. BUFFALO LinkStation 210, 4 TB

    one bay · 4 TB drive included · RAID claimed on a single bay · one network socket, speed unpublished · closed system · 24 months covering the drive

    A one-bay unit supplied with its 4 TB drive, whose first bullet offers RAID on a machine with a single bay and whose own first line recommends a different range for current macOS.

    Best for: A first network drive that has to work out of the box, on a Mac running macOS 15 or earlier or on Windows, with no interest in configuring anything.

    ≈ $193

  9. TERRAMASTER F8 SSD Plus, eight M.2 bays and no SATA bay at all

    eight M.2 2280 NVMe bays, no SATA · Core i3-N305, eight cores to 3.4 GHz · 16 GB DDR5 4800 · one 10GbE at 1024 MB/s · off-site backup named · under 19 dB in standby · 600 g (21.2 oz)

    The only all-solid-state enclosure on this shelf: eight M.2 NVMe bays, no SATA bay at all, in six hundred grams — and the only listing here that names an off-site backup arrangement.

    Best for: Eight solid-state drives in a space that will not take a tower, where an off-site copy is part of the plan from the start.

    ≈ $765

  10. UGREEN DH2300

    two bays · 64 TB ceiling on RAID 0 · processor unnamed · 4 GB soldered down · one 1GbE socket at 125 MB/s · no Docker, no virtual machines

    A two-bay enclosure that publishes a list of what it will not do — no Docker, no virtual machines, no Wi-Fi — and whose headline capacity rests on the array arrangement that carries no redundancy at all.

    Best for: A first NAS for photographs and backups, where knowing in advance what it will refuse to run is worth more than a specification sheet.

    ≈ $240

  11. UGREEN DXP6800 Plus, seven RAID levels named by number, memory unpublished

    six SATA bays and two M.2 NVMe · 208 TB on RAID 0 · Core i3-1215U, six cores and eight threads · memory not published · one 10GbE and one 2.5GbE · JBOD, Basic, RAID 0, 1, 5, 6 and 10 named

    The only listing on this shelf that lists every array level it supports — seven of them — and the only six-bay machine here, on a page that publishes no memory figure at all.

    Best for: Six bays where the array level has to be chosen from a published list, by a buyer who will look the memory up elsewhere.

    ≈ $939

  12. UGREEN DXP4800 GT

    four bays, two of them U.2 · two M.2 slots · AMD Ryzen R2514, four cores and eight threads to 3.70 GHz · 8 GB DDR4 to 64 GB, ECC on upgrade · two 10GbE sockets

    The most completely specified enclosure on this shelf: a processor with cores, threads and a clock, a 64 GB memory ceiling with an ECC upgrade path, two ten-gigabit sockets and bays that take three different kinds of drive.

    Best for: A four-bay machine asked to transcode, run containers and serve several people at ten gigabits, where the specification has to be readable before buying.

    ≈ $660

  13. QNAP TS-464-8G, four-bay enclosure with two 2.5GbE sockets

    four bays · Intel Celeron N5095, four cores to 2.9 GHz · 8 GB · two 2.5GbE sockets, 5 Gbps trunked · M.2 NVMe and a PCIe Gen 3 slot · no drive size, no RAID level, no software name

    A four-bay enclosure whose Amazon.com description names an Intel Celeron N5095, two 2.5GbE sockets that trunk to 5 Gbps, M.2 and PCIe Gen 3 expansion and 8 GB of memory — and whose title and bullets carry almost none of it.

    Best for: A household or small office that wants faster-than-gigabit transfers on existing cabling and a slot to add 10GbE or an SSD cache later.

    8.4/10

    ≈ $1,003

  14. BUFFALO LinkStation SoHo 220, 8 TB

    two bays · 8 TB as two 4 TB drives · ships in RAID 1 with 4 TB usable · copy from USB without a computer · three years covering the drives · macOS 15 ceiling

    The longest warranty on this shelf at three years, the only LinkStation here that copies from a USB device without a computer, and the only one whose network speed can be inferred only from the model it recommends instead.

    Best for: A small office that wants eight mirrored terabytes, a third year of cover on the drives, and a card or stick copied straight to the machine.

    ≈ $475

  15. BUFFALO LinkStation 220, 12 TB

    two bays · 12 TB of drives included · ships in RAID 1 with 6 TB usable · RAID 0 for the full 12 · redundancy named in the bullet, not the title · 24 months covering the drives

    One of five LinkStations on this shelf that publish both the array they ship in and the usable capacity it leaves — 12 TB of drives, 6 TB available, and the cheapest usable terabyte of the three LinkStation 220 capacities here.

    Best for: A two-bay machine wanted working and mirrored on the day it arrives, by someone who would rather read the usable figure than calculate it.

    ≈ $462

  16. Synology DS723+ bundle, 32 GB ECC and 40 TB supplied uninstalled

    two SATA bays and two M.2 2280 NVMe, both filled · Ryzen R1600, two cores at 2.6 GHz · 32 GB DDR4 ECC · two 1GbE with aggregation · one eSATA · DSM named · drives and memory supplied uninstalled

    The most expensive listing on this shelf by a factor of three and a half, arriving with 40 TB of drives, 1 TB of NVMe and 32 GB of ECC memory — none of it installed, and all of it behind two gigabit sockets.

    Best for: A buyer who wants ECC memory, forty terabytes and DSM in one delivery, and whose network will never need more than a gigabit.

    ≈ $3,529

  17. UGREEN DXP4800 Plus

    four bays · 144 TB claimed on RAID 0 · processor unnamed · memory unpublished · one 10GbE socket · 24 months of warranty

    A ten-gigabit four-bay machine whose page publishes neither a processor model nor a memory figure, and translates its 144 TB ceiling into one photograph count that disagrees with its own three other figures.

    Best for: A four-bay machine wanted for its ten-gigabit socket and its container support, by a buyer willing to look up the specification elsewhere.

    ≈ $657

  18. Asustor Drivestor 2 Lite AS1102TL, two-bay enclosure with one gigabit socket

    two bays · Realtek RTD1619B, four cores at 1.7 GHz · 1 GB DDR4 · one 1GbE socket · Btrfs and iSCSI snapshots named · sold without drives

    A two-bay enclosure whose title states the processor, the memory and the single gigabit socket, and whose page never names the drive interface, an array arrangement or the software that runs it.

    Best for: A first enclosure for a household copy of photographs and documents, where one gigabit is enough and where the buyer is content to look up the drive compatibility elsewhere.

    7.2/10

    No Amazon.com offer on October 26, 2026

  19. Yxk Zero1

    two bays · 2.5GbE named in the singular · Docker supported · RAID and snapshots named without a level · no processor, no memory, no port count

    A two-bay enclosure with a 2.5GbE connection and Docker support, on the thinnest hardware page on this shelf: no processor, no memory figure, no socket count.

    Best for: A first two-bay machine for someone who wants Docker and a 2.5-gigabit connection and will accept not knowing what runs it.

    No Amazon.com offer on October 26, 2026

  20. TERRAMASTER F4-425, four-bay enclosure with a stated 22 dB(A) and a named array scheme

    four bays · Intel x86 quad-core · 4 GB memory · one 2.5GbE socket · TRAID named · 22 dB(A) · 30 TB per bay, 120 TB in total

    A four-bay enclosure that publishes an acoustic figure, a per-bay ceiling and the name of its array scheme, and that never says what size of drive its four bays take.

    Best for: A media collection that has outgrown a two-bay unit and lives in a room where people sleep, bought by someone who will confirm the drive sizes separately.

    7.8/10

    No Amazon.com offer on October 26, 2026

  21. ACEMAGIC N3A, four-bay enclosure with two M.2 slots and a 128 GB SSD

    four HDD bays and two M.2 slots · up to 136 TB · 8 GB DDR4 · 128 GB PCIe 3.0 SSD · 2.5G and 1G LAN · processor and software not named

    A four-bay enclosure whose Amazon.com listing fits its whole specification into one line — four HDD bays, two M.2 slots, 2.5G and 1G LAN, 8 GB DDR4 and a 128 GB SSD — and names no processor and no software.

    Best for: A buyer who already knows this model and the software they will run on it, and wants four HDD bays plus two M.2 slots in one box.

    7.4/10

    No Amazon.com offer on October 26, 2026

The need before the model, across NAS enclosures

Hold several accesses at once

Memory is what runs out first as soon as several services run on the unit at the same time.

Synology DiskStation DS723+ with drives and memory

Not throttle the network

Port speed decides what actually leaves the box, whatever the drives inside can do.

TERRAMASTER F8 SSD Plus

Who buys what, across NAS enclosures

Fast, repeated access
Published solid-state slot count allows a cache or a fast volume alongside the drives.
Services running permanently
The published processor decides what the unit can do beyond storing. The gaps between models are considerable.
Redundant links
Published Ethernet port count allows accesses to be aggregated or separated. It varies from model to model.

Nothing is free: the trade-offs of NAS enclosures

Bay count against bulk and noise
More bays means more spinning drives, more heat and more permanent noise.
Processor against power draw
A more capable processor opens up uses and draws continuously, on a unit that never switches off.
Drive interface against available drives
The drive interface decides what goes into the bays. Few listings here publish it, so it is read on the maker's compatibility list before the drives are bought.

Buyers’ questions on NAS enclosures

Does a NAS enclosure come with drives?

On this shelf, the eight LinkStations arrive with their drives fitted and the DS723+ bundle ships its drives uninstalled; the other twelve are sold empty, with the drives chosen separately.

How many bays are needed?

The published bay count decides capacity and the redundancy layouts possible. It does not extend afterwards.

What is the solid-state slot for?

Depending on the model, a cache in front of the hard drives or a fast volume of its own. Where a listing publishes the slots, the count is shown on its page.

Is the memory expandable?

That depends on the model. This site publishes the memory supplied, as the maker states it.

What does the processor change?

It decides which services the unit can run beyond storage. Seven listings here name the chip; the LinkStations and several of the empty enclosures do not.

How many Ethernet ports?

Ethernet port count and port speed are shown separately, as each listing states them. The two are read together: a second socket helps several clients, a faster one helps a single client.

What are the USB ports for?

Depending on the model, backups from a drive or a camera, or peripherals. Most listings on this shelf do not count them.

Does a NAS replace a backup?

No. A mirror keeps the unit running through a failed drive; it does not survive a deletion, ransomware or a fire, which a copy kept somewhere else does.

What to take away from NAS enclosures

Bay count sets the ceiling, memory sets what runs on top, and port speed sets what gets out. The processor decides whether the unit does anything more than store.

The gist of NAS enclosures, at a glance

  • On Amazon.com on October 26, 2026: 17 of the 21 models had an offer, from $160 to $3,529.
  • Lowest Amazon.com price on October 26, 2026: Synology DiskStation DS124, at $160.
  • Memory: 2 to 32 GB, on 7 of the 21 models.

A comparison of NAS enclosures

The table shows only the data published by four devices in five. Under that threshold, a column compares empty fields.

ModelPriceBay countPublished operating system
Synology DiskStation DS124$160One — stated in the title as a 1-Bay diskless unit. Twelve of the twenty-one listings on this shelf are sold without a drive, and this is one of themSynology DiskStation Manager, DSM — named in the description, which states that its solutions are license-free and cover a private cloud, access from any device and collaboration. Three listings on this shelf name their operating system: DSM here and on the DS723+ bundle, and UGOS Pro on the UGREEN DXP4800 GT
BUFFALO LinkStation 210 LS210D0401$193One — stated in the title as 1-Bay and in the seventh bullet as one drive bay with the drive included. The first bullet calls the unit a NAS with RAID, which a single bay cannot provideNot named, and described as closed — the fourth bullet states a closed system chosen to reduce exposure from third-party applications, with SSL encryption for transfers. The fifth names the NAS Navigator management utility, with NAS Navigator 2 for macOS 15 and earlier
BUFFALO LinkStation 210 LS210D0601$231One — stated in the title as 1-Bay and in the seventh bullet as one drive bay with the drive included. The first bullet calls the unit a NAS with RAID, which a single bay cannot provideNot named, and described as closed — the fourth bullet states a closed system to reduce exposure from third-party applications, with SSL encryption for transfers. The fifth names NAS Navigator, with NAS Navigator 2 for macOS 15 and earlier
UGREEN NASync DH2300$240Two — stated in the title and in the first bullet as an entry-level two-bay unit for beginnersNot named on the listing, but its limits are published — the first bullet states no Docker and no virtual machines, the eighth adds no SAN Manager and states that Plex cannot be run through Docker, and the seventh calls the unit unsuitable for server applications
BUFFALO LinkStation 220 LS220D0402$286Two — stated in the title as 2-Bay and in the seventh bullet as two drive bays holding 4 TB in total, with the drives includedNot named, and described as closed — the fifth bullet states a closed system to reduce exposure from third-party applications, with SSL on transfers. NAS Navigator is named as the management utility, with NAS Navigator 2 for macOS 15 and earlier
BUFFALO LinkStation 220 LS220D0802$363Two — stated in the title as 2-Bay and in the seventh bullet as two drive bays holding 8 TB in total, with the drives includedNot named, and described as closed — the fifth bullet states a closed system to reduce exposure from third-party applications, with SSL on transfers. NAS Navigator is named as the management utility, with NAS Navigator 2 for macOS 15 and earlier
BUFFALO LinkStation 710 LS710D0801$383One — stated in the title as 1-Bay and in the seventh bullet as one drive bay with the drive included. Unlike the one-bay LinkStation 210 pages on this shelf, the first bullet makes no RAID claimNot named, and described as closed — the fourth bullet states that the LS700 uses a closed system to reduce exposure from third-party applications, with SSL on transfers. The fifth names NAS Navigator and PC backup software, with no macOS version caveat attached
BUFFALO LinkStation 720 LS720D0402$409Two — stated in the title as 2-Bay and in the seventh bullet as two drive bays holding 4 TB in total, with the drives includedNot named, and described as closed — the fourth bullet states that the LS700 uses a closed system to reduce exposure from third-party applications, with SSL on transfers. The fifth names NAS Navigator and PC backup software, with no macOS version caveat
Synology DS225+$421Two — stated in the title, and the second bullet places the model in the two-bay Plus series as the replacement for the DS224+Not named on the listing — the description covers syncing, mobile apps, desktop clients, a browser interface and file versioning without naming the software
BUFFALO LinkStation 220 LS220D1202$462Two — stated in the title as 2-Bay and in the seventh bullet as two drive bays holding 12 TB in total, with the drives includedNot named, and described as closed — the fourth bullet states a closed system to reduce exposure from third-party applications, with SSL encryption for transfers and RAID for redundancy. The fifth names NAS Navigator, with NAS Navigator 2 for macOS 15 and earlier
BUFFALO LinkStation SoHo 220 LS220D0802B$475Two — stated in the title as 2-Bay and in the seventh bullet as two drive bays holding 8 TB in total. The title specifies the division as 2 × 4 TB, which no other LinkStation page on this shelf doesNot named, and described as closed — the fifth bullet states a closed system to reduce exposure from third-party applications, with SSL on transfers. The sixth names NAS Navigator, with NAS Navigator 2 for macOS 15 and earlier
UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus$657Four — stated in the title as a 4-Bay unit. The second bullet gives a capacity ceiling of 144 TB without publishing the per-bay figure that would produce itNot named on the listing — the first bullet names Docker and virtual machines and the last states that all DXP models support both and that Plex can run through Docker. The software is described by function throughout and never called anything
UGREEN NASync DXP4800 GT$660Four — stated in the sixth bullet as four drive bays for SATA drives up to 32 TB each, with up to two of those same bays also accepting U.2 NVMe solid-state drivesUGOS Pro — named in the second bullet, with Docker, virtual machines and SAN Manager, and Plex, Emby, Jellyfin, Home Assistant and web hosting named as workloads. The eighth bullet states that Plex runs through Docker and must be set up by hand
TERRAMASTER F8 SSD Plus$765Eight — stated in the title and in the second bullet as eight M.2 2280 NVMe slots, each taking up to 8 TB for 64 TB in total. The arithmetic holds, and it is the highest bay count on this shelfNot named — the fifth bullet names the TerraMaster Business Backup Suite and its five parts: Centralized Backup, TerraSync, Duple Backup for off-site recovery, CloudSync and Snapshot for ransomware protection. The system that runs them is never called anything
UGREEN NASync DXP6800 Plus$939Six SATA bays, plus two M.2 NVMe slots — stated in the title and in the fourth bullet. It is the only six-bay machine on this shelf; the rest are at one, two, four or eightNot named — the fifth bullet describes an app gathering Storage Manager, Files and Photos in one place, and the last states that all DXP models support Docker and virtual machines and that Plex can run through Docker
QNAP TS-464-8G$1003Four, in the model designation TS-464 — the Amazon.com title, bullets and description never count the bays in wordsNot named on the listing — the description lists multi-cloud backup, a cloud storage gateway, real-time transcoding and 4K HDMI output without naming the software that provides them
Synology DiskStation DS723+ with drives and memory$3529Two SATA bays, plus two M.2 2280 NVMe slots — stated in the second bullet, with 40 TB as two 20 TB drives and 1 TB as two 500 GB modules. All four positions arrive filledSynology DSM — named plainly in the third bullet and again in the description. Three listings on this shelf name their operating system, and two of the three are Synology
ACEMAGIC N3A—Four HDD bays, plus two M.2 slots — stated in the title as 4-Bay and in the bullet as 4×HDD+2×M.2 SlotsNot published on the listing — the unit is sold diskless and no software is named; the 128 GB SSD is listed without saying what it holds
Asustor AS1102TL—Two — stated in the title as a 2 Bay enclosure, and the range name Drivestor 2 Lite carries the same figureNot published on the listing by name — the software is described through its features, Btrfs snapshots and Wake on LAN among them, and is never called anything
TERRAMASTER F4-425—Four — stated in the title as a 4 Bay unit and repeated in the fifth bullet as a 4-Bay NASNot published on the listing by name — the third bullet names the TNAS Mobile app used to set the unit up without a computer, and the software on the enclosure itself is never called anything
Yxk Zero1—Two — stated in the title as a 2-Bay desktop NAS and repeated in the first bulletNot named on the listing — the third bullet describes a phone app, a desktop client and any web browser across Windows, macOS, iOS and Android, and the first names Docker support. The software itself is never called anything

What each budget connects here

The guides devoted to NAS enclosures

Where the numbers are read

Specifications: manufacturer sheets for network and storage gear and the matching Amazon product pages. Prices and availability: Keepa. Every figure in this table names its source.

Most recent revision in this category: October 26, 2026.

What we look at on NAS enclosures

Every price named in a summary was read on the date that review carries. What a shop asks today is shown beside the product, and it moves.